Document Design
Remember, the whole purpose of HTML is to provide a way of distributing information in a non-browser specific format (for a browser-specific format, look at Adobe Acrobat). It's pretty pointless to create documents that only work on certain browsers. Minimally, your pages should be readable on at least Netscape, Mosaic, and Lynx.
Here's the <A HREF="table.html">daily schedule</A> for browsers with table support. For other browsers, a <A HREF="table.txt"> text-only version</A> is available.
Let me stress that I'm NOT suggesting that you should avoid using tables. Indeed, tables are one of the most useful improvements to the HTML specification. However, if you do use tables, you should always have a backup presentation to accomodate those who do not have table-capable browsers.
So when will it be "okay" to go exclusively with tables? In my opinion, not until the "Big Three" browsers (Netscape, Mosaic, and Lynx) support HTML 3.0 tables in their production versions (so beta and test versions do not count) on the three major platforms (Windows, Macintosh, and Unix). Since the Lynx developers have already begun to work on a version with table support, I think we can begin to rely on tables by the beginning of 1996.
[ Next Topic | Tips Table of Contents | HPCS ]
Last Modified: January 27, 1996
/ Eric Sasaki
esasaki@nyx.net
(feedback welcome)
All original content Copyright © 1994-96 Eric Sasaki. All rights reserved.